Avoid setting unattainable goals: Make them SMART
Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) serve as roadmaps for students with disabilities. At the heart of every IEP lies a set of carefully crafted goals, designed to guide a student's learning journey in the special education process.
However, even the most well-intentioned special education teachers and IEP teams can stumble when it comes to setting these goals.
The process of writing IEP goals is fraught with potential pitfalls that can have far-reaching consequences. When goals are poorly constructed or misaligned with a student's needs, the impact can be significant.
These mistakes can lead to inadequate support, misallocation of resources, and, most importantly, hinder a student's academic and personal growth.
A common issue in IEP goal writing is setting goals that are too ambiguous.
For example, a goal like "improve reading skills" lacks clarity and does not provide specific, measurable criteria for tracking progress.
Without clear benchmarks, how can you assess whether the student is improving in areas such as math, reading, writing, or behavior management? How can you set or manage expectations without measurable criteria?
Clear, measurable goals are essential for continuously monitoring progress. This, in turn, helps ensure that a student's learning requirements are addressed effectively and in a timely manner.
Solution: Break down a bigger objective into smaller, manageable steps to track progress effectively, for example:
A major mistake in IEP goal writing is not tailoring goals to the student’s unique needs.
For example, setting a broad goal like "increase reading comprehension" for both a student with ADHD and a student with dyslexia disregards their specific challenges.
A student with ADHD might need goals focusing on sustained attention, while a student with dyslexia might require goals targeting phonological processing.
Solution: Conduct a thorough evaluation of the student’s strengths, needs, and learning style.
Collaborate with the IEP team and the student to create goals that reflect the child’s learning profile.
A common flaw in IEP goal writing is the lack of specific, quantifiable outcomes.
Broad goals like “show improvement” or “work better with peers” are subjective and open to varying interpretations by the IEP team.
Solution: Incorporate measurable criteria into each goal.
Parents and teachers provide valuable insights into a student’s strengths, needs, and daily experiences.
However, their input is sometimes overlooked during IEP goal-setting. This can lead to creation of goals that do not fully reflect the student’s actual challenges.
This disconnect can result in conflicts between parents and schools regarding how the IEP meets the child's needs.
For example, a parent might advocate for more reading support, while the school might prioritize behavior goals.
How to Fix It: Involve parents and teachers early in the IEP process. Regular IEP meetings should encourage open communication, which ensures that goals align with the student’s real-world strengths and struggles.
Also, be sure to inform parents when some changes are made to the IEP for their input and approval.
Schools should proactively discuss changes with parents to avoid disagreements, as open communication enables a more collaborative and supportive environment.
For instance:
In an IEP meeting, the teacher may highlight the student’s need for additional support in social skills, while the parent points out challenges with staying organized at home.
Considering both perspectives, the IEP team can set a combined goal:
IEP goals are often set with deadlines that are either too ambitious or too far off, making it difficult for students to achieve them in the given time. This can frustrate both the student and educators.
For example, expecting a student to improve their reading level by two grades in just a few months may be unrealistic.
A more achievable goal might be: “The student will improve reading fluency by one grade level within six months.”
This approach ensures steady progress while avoiding setting the student up for failure.
Regular progress monitoring and adjustments to timeframes, if necessary, help keep the goals attainable and effective.
For instance, instead of expecting a student with ADHD to complete all tasks independently within a month, a more reasonable goal might be to gradually increase task independence over six months with built-in support strategies.
Routine progress monitoring ensures that IEP goals remain relevant and attainable.
Regular assessments provide data to guide the IEP team in making informed decisions about adjusting goals and strategies.
Various IEP meetings throughout the school year allow the team to track and update the student’s progress.
Quarterly or semester reviews during these meetings help reassess data, update strategies, and adjust goals.
Here's how to review and revise IEP goals effectively:
AbleSpace simplifies IEP management with powerful tools designed for educators and therapists.
Sign Up for Free